The idea of the transfer window closing prior to the opening Premier League game will be discussed at the next shareholders' board meeting with numerous managers expressing complaints of transfer sagas dragging on well past the start of the season.
Sean Dyche is one of the managers backing the proposed change as he believes the market can disrupt early season plans and is a distraction from the games themselves.
"I think the window will change days," said Dyche.
"Whether it's in January or at the beginning of the season, you want to get on and be doing your work.
"You don't want to start the season and lose three of your players when you're three games into the season. That could be really hard to take, and that happens.
"We've had that when we lost Charlie Austin at the start of a season, we had it with Andre Gray [last week].
"You don't want that all the time where a manager does all his work and then the players are gone and then you've somehow got to get players in.
"So I think if you could get that [bringing the window's closure forward] done as well, it means that once the football starts, the managers, coaches and teams can just get on with the football.
"And the fans, they can just get on with what they really want to be looking at and that is football matches."
Dyche also believes the changes could benefit managers as well.
The madness of it is that a manager can get judged on two games," he noted.
"So you can get judged very quickly, and in theory, those players' situations could make a big difference. It could change everything - hero to zero very quickly.
"If you've had three players and they've helped you, and all of a sudden they've been sold for whatever reason - not normally because the club want to, but because the fees were that big that they've had to do it - that could actually have a high impact on the manager's role, let alone just the viewpoint on it.
"So I just think there are a lot of reasons why if they can find a way with the deadline, then it would be better pushed forward. And any work would just have to be done earlier."